Lightweight Models & Cost-Effective Scalability – WordPress.com

Overview

WordPress.com is a hosted blogging platform based on the open source WordPress platform. It is designed to allow users to sign up and create their own blog. Users can choose from free or paid versions, with added functionality available on the paid platform, including the ability to use custom designs and to register and use a custom domain name instead of the free youraddress.wordpress.com sub-domain. WordPress provides a suite of easy to use tools including content editor for blogging, simple CMS functions and tagging. It also allows for simple customisation of their provided templates through the use of widgets, many of which allow content to be pulled from other services, such as Flickr feeds and RSS feeds from other blogs. WordPress.com blogs are hosted on the WordPress.com grid which is capable of scaling to handle enormous traffic spikes, load balanced across hundreds of servers (n.d.). This means that WordPress.com websites are automatically capable of handling going viral and will scale as necessary to meet the demand. While not as Lightweight as some startups, the company behind WordPress.com, Automattic operates with approximately 76 staff across the world (n.d.). 76 staff though is still remarkably small for a company that manages a network infrastructure with over 1,200 servers across 3 data centres (n.d.), whilst also continuously maintaining the WordPress.com platform and contributing to the further development of the open source WordPress platform. Not to mention handling customer support queries. It should be noted that while WordPress.com does provide an extensive self-service support section (n.d.), they do have email support services available, as well as paid VIP support for enterprise level clients (n.d.).

Comparison

Create a new blog entry in WordPress.com

WordPress.Com has two primary competitors, TypePad and Blogger. Comparatively, Blogger is the only one of these three platforms that was originally developed as a hosted blog publishing service and was first released in 1999 (n.d.). WordPress was originally developed as a standalone blog solution for individual blogs and was first released in 2003 by developer Matt Mullenweg (2003). TypePad has a similar story, originally developed as the Movable Type blogging platform that was first released in 2001 (n.d.). In 2003, Google bought Blogger and began to push it as a blog publishing service (n.d.), and in early 2005, WordPress.Com was released as a hosted blog publishing service (n.d.) and as a way to turn the open source platform into a viable business with an effective business model capable of revenue generation. TypePad came soon after in late 2005 (n.d.).

Of the 3 services, Blogger is the only one that is completely free with no paid versions available (n.d.). WordPress comparatively offers a full-featured free version with the ability to pay for the extra features you want to have added-on without the need for a subscription that may have unwanted features (n.d.). TypePad however puts the emphasis on their paid subscription plans with a free “Micro” version available for personal users offering a limited feature set (n.d.).

As mentioned earlier, WordPress.Com utilises a load-balanced grid, or in other words, a cloud of servers to manage their hosting and ensure cost-effective scalability for all their hosted blogs. Compared to this, TypePad describe their hosting as being provided in a tier 1 data centre (n.d.), but little more information is provided. No information is provided about exactly where or how Blogger websites are hosted, except that they are now run from Google servers.

It appears from browsing through the features, about information, pricing structures and tutorials for each of these services that Blogger is targeted towards personal users with only minimal support for large customers. WordPress.com and TypePad however appear to be designed to cater specifically for enterprise grade customers, with support for individual users as well. TypePad boasts large corporate clients such as ABC, MSNBC, CBC, BBC and Sky News (n.d.) whilst WordPress.com claims large clients such as the Dow Jones “AllThingsD”, the CNN “Political Ticker”, the official NFL blog, the official Flickr blog, and more.

All 3 of these systems however provide user friendly WYSIWYG editors, traffic statistics, the ability to display advertising and make money from ad traffic, promoting your blog, customising your design (though this does depend on paid upgrades to some degree for WordPress.com and TypePad), spam blocking, multiple-language support and some level of functional customisation and third party integration. Each of these systems also provides tagging and categorisation capabilities along with simplified CMS functionality, such as pages.

Implications

The implications of a system as robust as WordPress.com that is regularly updated and improved and is capable of withstanding an entire data centre outage (n.d.) is fantastic uptime with an easy to use system that is constantly improving. This means that individuals as well as companies are able to quickly and easily create content for the internet in a way that is capable of both becoming extremely popular and withstanding that popularity without downtime, serving most pages in under a tenth of a second (n.d.). This gives individuals the ability to have a voice and be heard, or to simply write about anything they want to share.

WordPress.com is a large part of what Web 2.0 is all about, user generated content. The implication here is that WordPress.com and it’s self-hosted counterpart, WordPress could be perceived as a large part of the driving force behind what the internet is today. The question is, how will it fit in with the internet of the future?

Potential Legal and Ethical issues

The main issue I can see here is content ownership. Who owns the content that a user publishes on WordPress.com? In their support section, WordPress.com makes it clear the users retain ownership of their data and provides suggestions on how to license their data or ensure their data is adequately protected by copyright laws, including suggested copyright notices and the ability to select Creative Commons licenses for content (n.d.).

The other issue I can see is with their hosted solutions. This is that if a significant amount of downtime was had, it could cause substantial losses for their customers. While this might not present such an issue with free customers, paying customers, especially those of VIP hosting, could have the potential for legal action if the problem is not solved satisfactorily and promptly.

Future Directions

The future direction of WordPress.com is vital to their continued growth and success as the web is changing towards a portable network where access is available from numerous non-traditional devices. At this time WordPress.com already supports mobile blogging, including iPhones and other mobile platforms, and features themes that are optimised for mobile readers. It makes sense though that their future focus should be on greater interoperability between systems. For example, users that maintain a cooking blog and have an internet connected fridge may find it convenient to simply send a recipe straight from their fridge to their blog based on the ingredients in their fridge.

It also makes sense that the future of WordPress.com should be continued scalability and light weight operation. As it becomes accessed from more and more devices, this means greater loads and greater need to scale easily and quickly. Operating as light as possible also means that more features can be made available for less or for free. As users want to pay as little as possible, this could be key in drawing potential paying customers away from competing platforms.

Where do you think WordPress.com should head?

References

Automattic. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://automattic.com/about/

Google. (n.d.). Blogger. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://www.blogger.com/

Mullenweg, M. (2003). WordPress now available. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://wordpress.org/news/2003/05/wordpress-now-available/

TypePad. (n.d.). Blog hosting. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://www.typepad.com/features/blog-hosting/

TypePad. (n.d.). Pricing. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://www.typepad.com/pricing/

TypePad. (n.d.). TypePad. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://www.typepad.com/

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Blogger (service). Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blogger_%28service%29

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Movable Type. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movable_Type

Wikipedia. (n.d.). TypePad. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TypePad

Wikipedia. (n.d.). WordPress. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordPress

Wikipedia. (n.d.). WordPress.com. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WordPress.com

WordPress. (n.d.). Premium features. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.wordpress.com/products/

WordPress. (n.d.). Prevent content theft. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.support.wordpress.com/prevent-content-theft/

WordPress. (n.d.). Support. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://en.support.wordpress.com/

WordPress. (n.d.). VIP Hosting. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://vip.wordpress.com/hosting/

WordPress. (n.d.). VIP Support. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://vip.wordpress.com/support/

WordPress. (n.d.). WordPress.com. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from https://wordpress.com/

Note: This blog post is part of a series of blog posts that form assessment item #2 for INB347 – Web 2.0 Applications.

2 thoughts on “Lightweight Models & Cost-Effective Scalability – WordPress.com”

  1. Hi Matt,

    I really enjoyed your post and think that wordpress is an excellent example of the use of a lightweight model. I found your thoughts interesting in relation to ownership of content. I wonder if this argument would change from country to country? What about if someone blogged about something defamatroy where in Queensland it may be considered offensive and in the USA they have the right to freedom of speech? And if the data is stored in the cloud where would you actually take action to have the data removed? Interesting post. Enjoyed reading it.

    • That’s a very good point, with varying laws from country to country it could have an interesting impact, given WordPress make it clear that users retain ownership of their content, but that that content is located in the cloud. I would assume the cloud provider is the one that would be approached, in this case a USA based company.

Leave a Reply to Matt Cancel reply

en_AUEnglish (Australia)
es_ESEspañol en_AUEnglish (Australia)